<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluffy Links &#8211; Monday January 18th 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2010/01/18/fluffy-links-monday-january-18th-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2010/01/18/fluffy-links-monday-january-18th-2010/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2010/01/18/fluffy-links-monday-january-18th-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-920846</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=7736#comment-920846</guid>
		<description>If I read that Dolly Freed article without the added information you&#039;ve included in your sentence I would not have been surprised to later find out it had been pitched *to* the writer by Random House. Total madness spending $2,000 chasing that. Similar features are ten-a-penny in newspaper magazines, albeit that one is above average. 

It&#039;s completely uneconomical - verging on stupidity - for any freelance to spend such sums to try cover something like that without having excellent chance of reimbursment.

It&#039;s not a future of journalism, in my opinion, because the novelty factor of donating for journalism like that - which provides minimal social improvement - will quickly wear off once more journalists begin to try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I read that Dolly Freed article without the added information you&#8217;ve included in your sentence I would not have been surprised to later find out it had been pitched *to* the writer by Random House. Total madness spending $2,000 chasing that. Similar features are ten-a-penny in newspaper magazines, albeit that one is above average. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s completely uneconomical &#8211; verging on stupidity &#8211; for any freelance to spend such sums to try cover something like that without having excellent chance of reimbursment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a future of journalism, in my opinion, because the novelty factor of donating for journalism like that &#8211; which provides minimal social improvement &#8211; will quickly wear off once more journalists begin to try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INB</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2010/01/18/fluffy-links-monday-january-18th-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-920841</link>
		<dc:creator>INB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=7736#comment-920841</guid>
		<description>That Dolly Freed article is a very good read alright, would have made perfect NYTimes Mag stuff too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Dolly Freed article is a very good read alright, would have made perfect NYTimes Mag stuff too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2010/01/18/fluffy-links-monday-january-18th-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-920838</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=7736#comment-920838</guid>
		<description>How did she spend 2k doing that?

It&#039;s a quality piece, just not sure about her spend at all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did she spend 2k doing that?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a quality piece, just not sure about her spend at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2010/01/18/fluffy-links-monday-january-18th-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-920832</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=7736#comment-920832</guid>
		<description>Nice one Damien, we hope our (Elly &amp; I&#039;s) new site will get people cooking real food. It&#039;s so much better for us all and it&#039;s so rewarding to sit down to a meal with friends and watch them enjoy it over conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Damien, we hope our (Elly &amp; I&#8217;s) new site will get people cooking real food. It&#8217;s so much better for us all and it&#8217;s so rewarding to sit down to a meal with friends and watch them enjoy it over conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

