<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The business case for freedom of speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WillKnott.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Going Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915385</link>
		<dc:creator>WillKnott.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Going Dark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915385</guid>
		<description>[...] Free speech = Net neutrality? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Free speech = Net neutrality? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackout Ireland - Some Questions &#124; Andyaz</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915266</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackout Ireland - Some Questions &#124; Andyaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915266</guid>
		<description>[...] Mulley suggests where this slippery slope could take us: &#8220;So first they&#8217;ll start with the Pirate Bay. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mulley suggests where this slippery slope could take us: &#8220;So first they&#8217;ll start with the Pirate Bay. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915265</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915265</guid>
		<description>Slightly related story from Australia, where they&#039;ve been trying to introduce some mandatory filtering - 

http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2009/02/key-backers-change-of-heart-endangers-aussie-net-filtering.ars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly related story from Australia, where they&#8217;ve been trying to introduce some mandatory filtering &#8211; </p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2009/02/key-backers-change-of-heart-endangers-aussie-net-filtering.ars" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2009/02/key-backers-change-of-heart-endangers-aussie-net-filtering.ars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Blog — John Keyes &#8211; IRMA try to censor the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Blog — John Keyes &#8211; IRMA try to censor the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915258</guid>
		<description>[...] recent action, demanding that Eircom block access to The Pirate Bay, has been well documented around the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent action, demanding that Eircom block access to The Pirate Bay, has been well documented around the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Blog — John Keyes &#8211; IRMA try to censor the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915257</link>
		<dc:creator>Personal Blog — John Keyes &#8211; IRMA try to censor the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915257</guid>
		<description>[...] recent action, demanding that Eircom block access to The Pirate Bay, has been well documented around the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent action, demanding that Eircom block access to The Pirate Bay, has been well documented around the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackout Ireland - a response to IRMA&#8217;s censorship demands / taint.org: Justin Mason's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915252</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackout Ireland - a response to IRMA&#8217;s censorship demands / taint.org: Justin Mason's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915252</guid>
		<description>[...] Pace Mulley: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pace Mulley: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Goldbach</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915245</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Goldbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915245</guid>
		<description>In this instance, the anit-populist view of the IRMA action makes an amicus curiae case much more likely in the High Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this instance, the anit-populist view of the IRMA action makes an amicus curiae case much more likely in the High Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eircom, IRMA &#38; Blackout Ireland &#124; Dave Kelly :: Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915242</link>
		<dc:creator>Eircom, IRMA &#38; Blackout Ireland &#124; Dave Kelly :: Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915242</guid>
		<description>[...] question is, as Damien points out, what if a copyrighted news article is reproduced on a site such as Boards.ie, does this mean that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] question is, as Damien points out, what if a copyrighted news article is reproduced on a site such as Boards.ie, does this mean that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915240</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915240</guid>
		<description>Surely this must be unconstitutional or something -  the media brew up a storm complaining about china blocking access to certain sites, now its happening here and it barely gets a mention</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely this must be unconstitutional or something &#8211;  the media brew up a storm complaining about china blocking access to certain sites, now its happening here and it barely gets a mention</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Music industry pushing for internet filtering as well as &#8220;three strikes&#8221; - what can you do about it?</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2009/02/23/the-business-case-for-freedom-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-915239</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Music industry pushing for internet filtering as well as &#8220;three strikes&#8221; - what can you do about it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=6041#comment-915239</guid>
		<description>[...] which could be blocked to Irish users based on a court hearing where only one side is heard. Damien Mulley makes the point well as usual: So first they’ll start with the Pirate Bay. Then comes Mininova, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which could be blocked to Irish users based on a court hearing where only one side is heard. Damien Mulley makes the point well as usual: So first they’ll start with the Pirate Bay. Then comes Mininova, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

