<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G&#8217;wan the Pin &#8211; Fianna Fáil and the Green&#8217;s €6.5Billion Builder bailout to be investigated by EU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2008/10/28/gwan-the-pin-fianna-fail-and-the-greens-e65billion-builder-bailout-to-be-investigated-by-eu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/10/28/gwan-the-pin-fianna-fail-and-the-greens-e65billion-builder-bailout-to-be-investigated-by-eu/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Budget &#8216;09 fallout continues - The Limerick Blogger Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/10/28/gwan-the-pin-fianna-fail-and-the-greens-e65billion-builder-bailout-to-be-investigated-by-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-912341</link>
		<dc:creator>Budget &#8216;09 fallout continues - The Limerick Blogger Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=4964#comment-912341</guid>
		<description>[...] Developers would have benefited from the &#8220;Home Choice Loans&#8221; scheme to the tune of €1.65 billion, although some believe this could rise to as much as €6b.  More details can be found here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Developers would have benefited from the &#8220;Home Choice Loans&#8221; scheme to the tune of €1.65 billion, although some believe this could rise to as much as €6b.  More details can be found here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verbo.se &#187; G’wan the Pin!</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/10/28/gwan-the-pin-fianna-fail-and-the-greens-e65billion-builder-bailout-to-be-investigated-by-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-912250</link>
		<dc:creator>Verbo.se &#187; G’wan the Pin!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=4964#comment-912250</guid>
		<description>[...] going to channel Damien on this as he&#8217;s put it way better than I could: Everyone’s fav property website (except maybe for Fianna Fáil, the Greens, Daft, MyHome and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to channel Damien on this as he&#8217;s put it way better than I could: Everyone’s fav property website (except maybe for Fianna Fáil, the Greens, Daft, MyHome and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/10/28/gwan-the-pin-fianna-fail-and-the-greens-e65billion-builder-bailout-to-be-investigated-by-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-912229</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=4964#comment-912229</guid>
		<description>Any way to tell which developers are set to benefit or have applied to sell houses via this scheme?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way to tell which developers are set to benefit or have applied to sell houses via this scheme?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronan Lupton</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/10/28/gwan-the-pin-fianna-fail-and-the-greens-e65billion-builder-bailout-to-be-investigated-by-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-912223</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronan Lupton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=4964#comment-912223</guid>
		<description>There should not be any specific provision exempting them taking the action under articles 81 to 87 broadly. I would however highlight Article 87, which negatives the or many cases: &lt;a href=&quot;http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12002E087:EN:HTML&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12002E087:EN:HTML&lt;/a&gt;

3 (a) would pose a specific problem.

Pages 12/28 &lt;a href=&quot;http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/2008_spring_en.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/2008_spring_en.pdf &lt;/a&gt;

Might be interesting to look at those pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should not be any specific provision exempting them taking the action under articles 81 to 87 broadly. I would however highlight Article 87, which negatives the or many cases: <a href="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12002E087:EN:HTML" rel="nofollow">http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12002E087:EN:HTML</a></p>
<p>3 (a) would pose a specific problem.</p>
<p>Pages 12/28 <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/2008_spring_en.pdf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/2008_spring_en.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/2008_spring_en.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Might be interesting to look at those pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

