<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluffy Links &#8211; Tuesday June 10th 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-835739</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/#comment-835739</guid>
		<description>Any idea when the Irish Times will be free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea when the Irish Times will be free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghan</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-834237</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/#comment-834237</guid>
		<description>It looks cool BUT... what&#039;s wrong with an ATM UI written in curses? Seriously, I wonder if full-on graphical ATM interfaces have been in use long enough for people to form ideas about what really works well. I know I haven&#039;t been using them. Do I really care if my balance appears with a jQuery style fade-in effect? How the heck will a blind user use it?

+1 to James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks cool BUT&#8230; what&#8217;s wrong with an ATM UI written in curses? Seriously, I wonder if full-on graphical ATM interfaces have been in use long enough for people to form ideas about what really works well. I know I haven&#8217;t been using them. Do I really care if my balance appears with a jQuery style fade-in effect? How the heck will a blind user use it?</p>
<p>+1 to James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz Biscuit: &#187; Irish Times online slowly slowly catching up&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-833124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Biscuit: &#187; Irish Times online slowly slowly catching up&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/#comment-833124</guid>
		<description>[...] via Admiral Mulley.  Digg this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Admiral Mulley.  Digg this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-833094</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/06/10/fluffy-links-tuesday-june-10th-2008/#comment-833094</guid>
		<description>The ATM design changes are pretty enough but I&#039;m not convinced that the design as a whole is better in terms of a UI experience. For example, the &#039;frequently used&#039; menu on the left hand side shown seems to have two pretty much identical options for cheque deposit. Couple of other things but no point going into them here - just seems that they take the view of &#039;prettier = better design&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ATM design changes are pretty enough but I&#8217;m not convinced that the design as a whole is better in terms of a UI experience. For example, the &#8216;frequently used&#8217; menu on the left hand side shown seems to have two pretty much identical options for cheque deposit. Couple of other things but no point going into them here &#8211; just seems that they take the view of &#8216;prettier = better design&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

