<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! joins Open Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 73man</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/comment-page-1/#comment-688596</link>
		<dc:creator>73man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/#comment-688596</guid>
		<description>Woohoo! I mean Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo! I mean Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/comment-page-1/#comment-687347</link>
		<dc:creator>John O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/#comment-687347</guid>
		<description>Opensocial is a google gadget distribution platform with a hint of local social apis in  containers that claim opensocial compliance (difficult to do given there is no reference impl but I digress).

The only significance I see in this announcement is that Yahoo are kowtow&#039;ing to google gadget standard.  This is not necessarily a good thing esp when you consider the significant expertise and rile Yahoo already had in the evolution of widgets to date.

Meanwhile, the  &quot;OpenSocial Foundation&quot; website http://www.opensocial.org/ is just a fountain of information - yawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opensocial is a google gadget distribution platform with a hint of local social apis in  containers that claim opensocial compliance (difficult to do given there is no reference impl but I digress).</p>
<p>The only significance I see in this announcement is that Yahoo are kowtow&#8217;ing to google gadget standard.  This is not necessarily a good thing esp when you consider the significant expertise and rile Yahoo already had in the evolution of widgets to date.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the  &#8220;OpenSocial Foundation&#8221; website <a href="http://www.opensocial.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensocial.org/</a> is just a fountain of information &#8211; yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/comment-page-1/#comment-687334</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/#comment-687334</guid>
		<description>yeah, I&#039;ll wait until it&#039;s less vapourous before I get too excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I&#8217;ll wait until it&#8217;s less vapourous before I get too excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darragh</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/comment-page-1/#comment-687239</link>
		<dc:creator>Darragh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/03/25/yahoo-joins-open-social/#comment-687239</guid>
		<description>I know I *should* get the importance of this, but, erm, I don&#039;t. I don&#039;t get it.

Why is OpenSocial important to Social Networking and to the interweb?

Whether they&#039;ll &quot;do what Bebo did&quot; - from a user perspective the new myriad of apps have slowed the site to a crawl - so much so that Bebo have to turn off features at certain times - and rendered many pages illegible amid the multiple slideshows, calendars, sharing luvs, baking muffins, barking babies and so on. What was once a nice wee page to express your individuality (in a completely conforming way) is now akin to trying to say a personal hello to Times Square.

Doubtless there are benefits to programmers and advertisers in there somewhere, but I don&#039;t see how. Not yet. Fully prepared to keep an open mind though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I *should* get the importance of this, but, erm, I don&#8217;t. I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>Why is OpenSocial important to Social Networking and to the interweb?</p>
<p>Whether they&#8217;ll &#8220;do what Bebo did&#8221; &#8211; from a user perspective the new myriad of apps have slowed the site to a crawl &#8211; so much so that Bebo have to turn off features at certain times &#8211; and rendered many pages illegible amid the multiple slideshows, calendars, sharing luvs, baking muffins, barking babies and so on. What was once a nice wee page to express your individuality (in a completely conforming way) is now akin to trying to say a personal hello to Times Square.</p>
<p>Doubtless there are benefits to programmers and advertisers in there somewhere, but I don&#8217;t see how. Not yet. Fully prepared to keep an open mind though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

