<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fanny Waters is at it again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windbag Puncturedâ€“Bock The Robber</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-563361</link>
		<dc:creator>Windbag Puncturedâ€“Bock The Robber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-563361</guid>
		<description>[...] Major put a link to one of Waters&#8217;s early rants here and this led to a furore of debate on Mulley, Daragh O&#8217;Brien and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Major put a link to one of Waters&#8217;s early rants here and this led to a furore of debate on Mulley, Daragh O&#8217;Brien and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-559345</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-559345</guid>
		<description>I agree Isitjustme? - he had a tendency to do that sort of thing too (Raglan Road being another example where no-one comes close to his rendition).

I hope the four bloggers in the IT corner him in the canteen at the next opportunity and steal his lunch money. They should YouTube it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Isitjustme? &#8211; he had a tendency to do that sort of thing too (Raglan Road being another example where no-one comes close to his rendition).</p>
<p>I hope the four bloggers in the IT corner him in the canteen at the next opportunity and steal his lunch money. They should YouTube it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Waters: &#8220;Journalist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-554669</link>
		<dc:creator>John Waters: &#8220;Journalist&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-554669</guid>
		<description>[...] And Damien&#8230; says his piece&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Damien&#8230; says his piece&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isitjustme?</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-554161</link>
		<dc:creator>Isitjustme?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-554161</guid>
		<description>Ahhh Adam thanks. I assumed they were Lukes.
His voice made the song though, wouldn&#039;t you agree?.

Good point regarding Fanny&#039;s colleagues at the Times...I can see Jim Carroll kicking some Fanny butt shortly..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh Adam thanks. I assumed they were Lukes.<br />
His voice made the song though, wouldn&#8217;t you agree?.</p>
<p>Good point regarding Fanny&#8217;s colleagues at the Times&#8230;I can see Jim Carroll kicking some Fanny butt shortly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Head Rambles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In defence of John Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-553644</link>
		<dc:creator>Head Rambles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In defence of John Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-553644</guid>
		<description>[...] Twenty has a podcast of John. Darragh O&#8217;Brien had a fairly balanced article on the subject, while Damien goes head first on the offensive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twenty has a podcast of John. Darragh O&#8217;Brien had a fairly balanced article on the subject, while Damien goes head first on the offensive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-553127</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-553127</guid>
		<description>As I said on Markham Nolan&#039;s blog, I wonder if he judges all media as a single entity and if he feels we should not take The Irish Times seriously because it shares a medium with Nuts, Hello! and Playboy.

I also wonder if his &quot;bloggers are idiots&quot; theory extends to his blogging colleagues in The Irish Times.

Also:
@Isitjustme? - They&#039;re Phil Coulter&#039;s words :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on Markham Nolan&#8217;s blog, I wonder if he judges all media as a single entity and if he feels we should not take The Irish Times seriously because it shares a medium with Nuts, Hello! and Playboy.</p>
<p>I also wonder if his &#8220;bloggers are idiots&#8221; theory extends to his blogging colleagues in The Irish Times.</p>
<p>Also:<br />
@Isitjustme? &#8211; They&#8217;re Phil Coulter&#8217;s words <img src='http://www.mulley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one more hour :: They Can&#8217;t Stop The Satanism :: January :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-553042</link>
		<dc:creator>one more hour :: They Can&#8217;t Stop The Satanism :: January :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-553042</guid>
		<description>[...] Fanny Waters is at it again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fanny Waters is at it again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isitjustme?</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-552344</link>
		<dc:creator>Isitjustme?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-552344</guid>
		<description>&#039; In the words of the late great Luke Kelly (if he were alive he&#039;d probably blog) Scorn not his simplicity...&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216; In the words of the late great Luke Kelly (if he were alive he&#8217;d probably blog) Scorn not his simplicity&#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dermot</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-552316</link>
		<dc:creator>Dermot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-552316</guid>
		<description>Listen after reading Waters book (Lapsed Agnostic) he doesn&#039;t need a rhyme nor reason for anything. [my brief comments on the book are here http://www.10thmonth.net/detrius/2008/01/what-have-you-changed-your-min.html]

We&#039;re back to the Bloggers versus Journalists flamebait again. Lets face it there is an awful lot of crap on the Internet. And there is an awful lot of crap in the papers and elsewhere. (i.e. Sturgeons Law that &#039;90% of everything is crud&#039;). Given the volume of people online the signal among the noise is amazing.  (If someone said I could choose to give up the Internet or Newspapers again there would be no contest)

Its Waters bad luck that he doesn&#039;t bother his arse to look at it. He&#039;s not a journalist or he&#039;d check his facts. He has become a bit of a ranter really. An elitist ranter at that (who do those people think they are thinking they can write).  

Deserving more of sorrow than anger. 

Dermot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen after reading Waters book (Lapsed Agnostic) he doesn&#8217;t need a rhyme nor reason for anything. [my brief comments on the book are here <a href="http://www.10thmonth.net/detrius/2008/01/what-have-you-changed-your-min.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.10thmonth.net/detrius/2008/01/what-have-you-changed-your-min.html</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;re back to the Bloggers versus Journalists flamebait again. Lets face it there is an awful lot of crap on the Internet. And there is an awful lot of crap in the papers and elsewhere. (i.e. Sturgeons Law that &#8216;90% of everything is crud&#8217;). Given the volume of people online the signal among the noise is amazing.  (If someone said I could choose to give up the Internet or Newspapers again there would be no contest)</p>
<p>Its Waters bad luck that he doesn&#8217;t bother his arse to look at it. He&#8217;s not a journalist or he&#8217;d check his facts. He has become a bit of a ranter really. An elitist ranter at that (who do those people think they are thinking they can write).  </p>
<p>Deserving more of sorrow than anger. </p>
<p>Dermot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branedy</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-552264</link>
		<dc:creator>Branedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2008/01/16/fanny-waters-is-at-it-again/#comment-552264</guid>
		<description>I am, therefore I Blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am, therefore I Blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
