<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging killed God, the Bible and single sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/12/25/blogging-killed-god-the-bible-and-single-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/12/25/blogging-killed-god-the-bible-and-single-sources/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ciaran Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/12/25/blogging-killed-god-the-bible-and-single-sources/#comment-514676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciaran Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/12/25/blogging-killed-god-the-bible-and-single-sources/#comment-514676</guid>
		<description>"doesn’t that mean the Bible and God herself are going to be cynically looked at?"

I would hope that they would always be looked at cynically, unless there is some conclusive proof - which I'd say is fairly unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;doesn’t that mean the Bible and God herself are going to be cynically looked at?&#8221;</p>
<p>I would hope that they would always be looked at cynically, unless there is some conclusive proof - which I&#8217;d say is fairly unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Depping</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/12/25/blogging-killed-god-the-bible-and-single-sources/#comment-514583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Depping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/12/25/blogging-killed-god-the-bible-and-single-sources/#comment-514583</guid>
		<description>Not sure if I picked up your point correctly or not, but it's worth noting that the  Bible is composed of 66 books, written over a period of 1600 years by about 40 different authors in 3 different languages and across a number of countries.  I'm sure it stacks up well as a collabaritive effor and probably the only one that spans 16 centuries :-)
Of course I'd still undsertand it to have a single ultimate source, as it claims to be directly inspired by God himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I picked up your point correctly or not, but it&#8217;s worth noting that the  Bible is composed of 66 books, written over a period of 1600 years by about 40 different authors in 3 different languages and across a number of countries.  I&#8217;m sure it stacks up well as a collabaritive effor and probably the only one that spans 16 centuries <img src='http://www.mulley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Of course I&#8217;d still undsertand it to have a single ultimate source, as it claims to be directly inspired by God himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
