<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluffy Links &#8211; Friday October 5th 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:41:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tis Me</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-406396</link>
		<dc:creator>Tis Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/#comment-406396</guid>
		<description>Check out the claim on this blog:
http://kozyndan.livejournal.com/113874.html

that the bravia add concept is nicked.. And it looks to be true..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the claim on this blog:<br />
<a href="http://kozyndan.livejournal.com/113874.html" rel="nofollow">http://kozyndan.livejournal.com/113874.html</a></p>
<p>that the bravia add concept is nicked.. And it looks to be true..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paige</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-403403</link>
		<dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/#comment-403403</guid>
		<description>Mulley on fire is a thing of beauty.  Even if a little un-necessarily violent.
Stop broadening my mind.

Paige</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mulley on fire is a thing of beauty.  Even if a little un-necessarily violent.<br />
Stop broadening my mind.</p>
<p>Paige</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 73man</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-403270</link>
		<dc:creator>73man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/#comment-403270</guid>
		<description>Geez and I thought I was being a bitter so and so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez and I thought I was being a bitter so and so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneForTheRoad</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-403201</link>
		<dc:creator>OneForTheRoad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/#comment-403201</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t Hot Press just fuck off and die?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Hot Press just fuck off and die?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 73man</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-402628</link>
		<dc:creator>73man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/2007/10/05/fluffy-links-friday-october-5th-2007/#comment-402628</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Peter Cochrane link. At least he doesn&#039;t set up a straw man only to make his argument appear stronger: &quot;I suppose the basket-weaving, back-to-basics fraternity might applaud such an outcome, but I do not.&quot; I mean what precisely is he talking about? 

All he is missing is that great catch all, semi-apologetic &quot;some of my best friends are non-risk takers.&quot; Lever Bros used a similar point in their Dirt is Good campaign: that kids need to get down and dirty to build up their immune systems. I mean it was only meant to shift product after all, not assist in the survival of the species. Cf. Dove&#039;s redefining beauty campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Peter Cochrane link. At least he doesn&#8217;t set up a straw man only to make his argument appear stronger: &#8220;I suppose the basket-weaving, back-to-basics fraternity might applaud such an outcome, but I do not.&#8221; I mean what precisely is he talking about? </p>
<p>All he is missing is that great catch all, semi-apologetic &#8220;some of my best friends are non-risk takers.&#8221; Lever Bros used a similar point in their Dirt is Good campaign: that kids need to get down and dirty to build up their immune systems. I mean it was only meant to shift product after all, not assist in the survival of the species. Cf. Dove&#8217;s redefining beauty campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
