<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Google phone thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Views on Microsoft HealthVault and the future of &#8220;activity datastores&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-412444</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Views on Microsoft HealthVault and the future of &#8220;activity datastores&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-412444</guid>
		<description>[...] get money as we surf. I&#8217;ve already suggested that service providers will get a kickback from Google for offering something like free broadband,but perhaps eventually those kickbacks will travel up the chain to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get money as we surf. I&#8217;ve already suggested that service providers will get a kickback from Google for offering something like free broadband,but perhaps eventually those kickbacks will travel up the chain to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Google Phone (again) now with GrandCentral and Jaiku and what if Cubic Phones got into the mix?</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-407795</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Google Phone (again) now with GrandCentral and Jaiku and what if Cubic Phones got into the mix?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-407795</guid>
		<description>[...] be a hardware device and that Google was working on something like a competitor to Windows Mobile. Told you so.  Anyways, with the Jaiku deal announced yesterday, I thought I&#8217;d re-examine the Google Mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be a hardware device and that Google was working on something like a competitor to Windows Mobile. Told you so.  Anyways, with the Jaiku deal announced yesterday, I thought I&#8217;d re-examine the Google Mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-353994</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 05:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-353994</guid>
		<description>Funny, I think they may well release a phone actually. Not to compete with apple but to compete with the operators. I think the next big battle will be between the major Internet Cos and the mobile operators - Google doesn't want to share all the lolly with the greedy wireless telcos, and I think we might see them trying to offer free/freemium ad-supported mobile services. 

Certainly recent moves in the US suggest that mobile is extremely important to Google, and I cant see the current walled model of the operators being defensible forever.

As for positioning of a Google phone? I imagine it would be low end (read cheap for the masses) but allowing Internet access. That's what they're interested in. 

All IMHO of course.

Rgds
R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I think they may well release a phone actually. Not to compete with apple but to compete with the operators. I think the next big battle will be between the major Internet Cos and the mobile operators - Google doesn&#8217;t want to share all the lolly with the greedy wireless telcos, and I think we might see them trying to offer free/freemium ad-supported mobile services. </p>
<p>Certainly recent moves in the US suggest that mobile is extremely important to Google, and I cant see the current walled model of the operators being defensible forever.</p>
<p>As for positioning of a Google phone? I imagine it would be low end (read cheap for the masses) but allowing Internet access. That&#8217;s what they&#8217;re interested in. </p>
<p>All IMHO of course.</p>
<p>Rgds<br />
R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Browne</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-351867</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-351867</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
In fact at the end of this year 50% of the world population will have a mobile phone but most of these will not be running Windows Mobile
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Good reminder. I'd expect Google to do what the've done in the HTML / Ajax area: push the boundaries for the people that have the advanced gadgets, while still providing a basic service for those that don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
In fact at the end of this year 50% of the world population will have a mobile phone but most of these will not be running Windows Mobile
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good reminder. I&#8217;d expect Google to do what the&#8217;ve done in the HTML / Ajax area: push the boundaries for the people that have the advanced gadgets, while still providing a basic service for those that don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evert</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-351356</link>
		<dc:creator>Evert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-351356</guid>
		<description>It's like with most things in business; you can offer super-dooper, do everything services that will only work on new (expensive) devices ort platforms or you can offer a good, stable (but still disruptive/innovative) service that will work on a type of device already owned and used by millions of people. This also applies to the whole WiFi/Wimax debate.
The logic is obvious....

E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like with most things in business; you can offer super-dooper, do everything services that will only work on new (expensive) devices ort platforms or you can offer a good, stable (but still disruptive/innovative) service that will work on a type of device already owned and used by millions of people. This also applies to the whole WiFi/Wimax debate.<br />
The logic is obvious&#8230;.</p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Swiss Job</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-351266</link>
		<dc:creator>The Swiss Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-351266</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. It wouldn't make any sense to go straighti nto competition with the iPhone this close after it's release. But give the hype a while to calm down, I don't think the sales of iPhones will be as good as predicted and Google may learn a thing or two. Then they'll release it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. It wouldn&#8217;t make any sense to go straighti nto competition with the iPhone this close after it&#8217;s release. But give the hype a while to calm down, I don&#8217;t think the sales of iPhones will be as good as predicted and Google may learn a thing or two. Then they&#8217;ll release it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/08/07/this-google-phone-thing/#comment-351258</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2415#comment-351258</guid>
		<description>Nice points there Damien, certainly got me thinking. You think FON would offer free wi-fi to phones via google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice points there Damien, certainly got me thinking. You think FON would offer free wi-fi to phones via google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
