<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At least they&#8217;re Flickring behind closed doors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:41:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tipster</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-281178</link>
		<dc:creator>tipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-281178</guid>
		<description>From one of the twitterers: &quot;&lt;i&gt;There are a lot of green party member who are civil servants they&#039;re all asking very specific questions on policy. A bunch of realos i say.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Interesting claim that a lot of the GP members are civil servants. If it&#039;s true it would be a breach of civil service regulations (unless they&#039;re all in very junior grades).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From one of the twitterers: &#8220;<i>There are a lot of green party member who are civil servants they&#8217;re all asking very specific questions on policy. A bunch of realos i say.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting claim that a lot of the GP members are civil servants. If it&#8217;s true it would be a breach of civil service regulations (unless they&#8217;re all in very junior grades).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaithÃ­</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280636</link>
		<dc:creator>DaithÃ­</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280636</guid>
		<description>Just live on RTÃ‰.  86%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just live on RTÃ‰.  86%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280588</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280588</guid>
		<description>photo reminds me of &quot;close encounters&quot; 
is this their close encounter

http://url.ie/4e7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>photo reminds me of &#8220;close encounters&#8221;<br />
is this their close encounter</p>
<p><a href="http://url.ie/4e7" rel="nofollow">http://url.ie/4e7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280561</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280561</guid>
		<description>Conor O&#039;Neill&#039;s nickname after the whole MMR shite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conor O&#8217;Neill&#8217;s nickname after the whole MMR shite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaithÃ­</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280553</link>
		<dc:creator>DaithÃ­</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280553</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think McKenna has ever voted yes to anything? Anyway, &quot;Typhoid&quot; - dare I ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think McKenna has ever voted yes to anything? Anyway, &#8220;Typhoid&#8221; &#8211; dare I ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280550</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280550</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget we have tweets coming &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/stephencrowley&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;from inside the building&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget we have tweets coming <a href="http://twitter.com/stephencrowley" rel="nofollow">from inside the building</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280537</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280537</guid>
		<description>Ooops, I didn&#039;t mean to make it sound like they excluded bloggers because they were bloggers. I just meant some of the IrishElection.com crew asked to go and they said no. I was hoping since they are into blogging now and they even have their own press mailing list for bloggers, that they&#039;d invite them along. I wonder had I joined the Green Party yesterday, would I have been allowed go? :)

And yeah, it&#039;d be intriguing to see how something like this would be debated. Typhoid McKenna was on RTE a few minutes ago making a fuss over the whole thing and a deal with FF. She said she&#039;s probably vote no. Why be constructive when you can be sensationalist, eh Typhoid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, I didn&#8217;t mean to make it sound like they excluded bloggers because they were bloggers. I just meant some of the IrishElection.com crew asked to go and they said no. I was hoping since they are into blogging now and they even have their own press mailing list for bloggers, that they&#8217;d invite them along. I wonder had I joined the Green Party yesterday, would I have been allowed go? <img src='http://www.mulley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And yeah, it&#8217;d be intriguing to see how something like this would be debated. Typhoid McKenna was on RTE a few minutes ago making a fuss over the whole thing and a deal with FF. She said she&#8217;s probably vote no. Why be constructive when you can be sensationalist, eh Typhoid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280514</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280514</guid>
		<description>What, ELECTRIC light? At the Green party conference? Next you&#039;ll be saying that some of them arrived in cars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, ELECTRIC light? At the Green party conference? Next you&#8217;ll be saying that some of them arrived in cars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaithÃ­</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280491</link>
		<dc:creator>DaithÃ­</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280491</guid>
		<description>On the other hand I&#039;d give at least one limb to be there.  But I can see why they want to keep it private, and the Greens are on the good side of the openness spectrum in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand I&#8217;d give at least one limb to be there.  But I can see why they want to keep it private, and the Greens are on the good side of the openness spectrum in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaithÃ­</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/06/13/at-least-theyre-flickring-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-280488</link>
		<dc:creator>DaithÃ­</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2265#comment-280488</guid>
		<description>&quot;I believe bloggers asked to attend and got told no. Shame.&quot;

They didn&#039;t refuse bloggers because they were bloggers, they refused non-Green-member-bloggers because they aren&#039;t members of the Green Party.  If journalists or architects or artists or redheads asked they would get the same answer...

This meeting is (I believe) a members-only affair; I think they&#039;re entitled to their private meetings.  It&#039;s nothing to do with blogging :-) and at least the members get to have a say, as opposed to Fianna FÃ¡il (there were no bloggers in their parliamentary party meeting either, other than Noel Dempsey).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe bloggers asked to attend and got told no. Shame.&#8221;</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t refuse bloggers because they were bloggers, they refused non-Green-member-bloggers because they aren&#8217;t members of the Green Party.  If journalists or architects or artists or redheads asked they would get the same answer&#8230;</p>
<p>This meeting is (I believe) a members-only affair; I think they&#8217;re entitled to their private meetings.  It&#8217;s nothing to do with blogging <img src='http://www.mulley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and at least the members get to have a say, as opposed to Fianna FÃ¡il (there were no bloggers in their parliamentary party meeting either, other than Noel Dempsey).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
