<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluffy Links - May 30th 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/05/30/fluffy-links-may-30th-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/05/30/fluffy-links-may-30th-2007/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/05/30/fluffy-links-may-30th-2007/#comment-264655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2222#comment-264655</guid>
		<description>More IEDR nonsense, remind us again how expensive they are?  Remind us of the hoops that they make people jump through to obtain one of their supposedly "safe" domains?  Why not open access to the domain and leave the squabbling to the courts when necessary?  It's a typically Irish solution, viz, wrap everything up in pointless beaurocracy and charge over the odds for it.  Nobody wins (perhaps not even the IEDR!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More IEDR nonsense, remind us again how expensive they are?  Remind us of the hoops that they make people jump through to obtain one of their supposedly &#8220;safe&#8221; domains?  Why not open access to the domain and leave the squabbling to the courts when necessary?  It&#8217;s a typically Irish solution, viz, wrap everything up in pointless beaurocracy and charge over the odds for it.  Nobody wins (perhaps not even the IEDR!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/05/30/fluffy-links-may-30th-2007/#comment-261601</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2222#comment-261601</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that the National Theatre in London actually looks good covered in grass, being as it is, an enormous concrete carbunkle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that the National Theatre in London actually looks good covered in grass, being as it is, an enormous concrete carbunkle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/05/30/fluffy-links-may-30th-2007/#comment-261543</link>
		<dc:creator>John Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 08:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2222#comment-261543</guid>
		<description>"Hang on. If the IEDR’s revenue from domains dropped by 2%, how come they had a 15% drop in profits? The crap from Curtin about .ie being a safe domain is a bit of a joke when certain non-Irish companies are squatting on dozens of lucrative generic domain names." - Damien, I had a fairly comprehensive interview with Mr Curtin on Monday more of which will be featured on Friday's technology pages in the Times. He touched on all of these issues and I'll be discussing them then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hang on. If the IEDR’s revenue from domains dropped by 2%, how come they had a 15% drop in profits? The crap from Curtin about .ie being a safe domain is a bit of a joke when certain non-Irish companies are squatting on dozens of lucrative generic domain names.&#8221; - Damien, I had a fairly comprehensive interview with Mr Curtin on Monday more of which will be featured on Friday&#8217;s technology pages in the Times. He touched on all of these issues and I&#8217;ll be discussing them then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
