<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluffy Links &#8211; April 4th 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nivi</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-242305</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 08:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2031#comment-242305</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is Nivi from Venture Hacks. Thanks for the mention!

We&#039;ve got a Cheat Sheet of all our hacks here: http://www.venturehacks.com/term-sheet-hacks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is Nivi from Venture Hacks. Thanks for the mention!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got a Cheat Sheet of all our hacks here: <a href="http://www.venturehacks.com/term-sheet-hacks/" rel="nofollow">http://www.venturehacks.com/term-sheet-hacks/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GerryOS</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-211309</link>
		<dc:creator>GerryOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2031#comment-211309</guid>
		<description>Ultimately, the market will decide whether this new product is a rip-off or not.  The standard DRM&#039;d format will still be available at â‚¬0.99 alongside the new higher-quality, DRM-free one at â‚¬1.29. What it cost EMI or Apple to bring this new product to the market is irrelevant. If the market decides that the new product is poor value for money in comparison to the existing one, it will not buy it. The retail music business is an open, competitive and free market after all. We shall see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately, the market will decide whether this new product is a rip-off or not.  The standard DRM&#8217;d format will still be available at â‚¬0.99 alongside the new higher-quality, DRM-free one at â‚¬1.29. What it cost EMI or Apple to bring this new product to the market is irrelevant. If the market decides that the new product is poor value for money in comparison to the existing one, it will not buy it. The retail music business is an open, competitive and free market after all. We shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-211141</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2031#comment-211141</guid>
		<description>Gerry, a 33% premium to remove DRM and for an increase in quality *is* a ripoff. I don&#039;t think it cost Apple or EMI 33% exdtra to do this or even 1%. It&#039;s just a way of taking more money for the same old rope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerry, a 33% premium to remove DRM and for an increase in quality *is* a ripoff. I don&#8217;t think it cost Apple or EMI 33% exdtra to do this or even 1%. It&#8217;s just a way of taking more money for the same old rope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CmdNotCtrl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reaction To That Apple-EMI Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-210648</link>
		<dc:creator>CmdNotCtrl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reaction To That Apple-EMI Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2031#comment-210648</guid>
		<description>[...] Similarly, Damien Mulley (a blogger for whom I have a great deal of respect) declares the new dispensation to be a &#8220;Ripoff.&#8221; Sorry, Damien, but music downloads are not an essential in life, and if you feel that this new product is a ripoff, then don&#8217;t buy it. The recorded music business is an open competitive market, and if Apple and EMI have made a mistake by pricing this new product at a premium, then the market will tell them this toot sweet. Higher gas prices in a monopoly market; unnecessary bank charges or insurance cover in a cartelised market - those are ripoffs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Similarly, Damien Mulley (a blogger for whom I have a great deal of respect) declares the new dispensation to be a &#8220;Ripoff.&#8221; Sorry, Damien, but music downloads are not an essential in life, and if you feel that this new product is a ripoff, then don&#8217;t buy it. The recorded music business is an open competitive market, and if Apple and EMI have made a mistake by pricing this new product at a premium, then the market will tell them this toot sweet. Higher gas prices in a monopoly market; unnecessary bank charges or insurance cover in a cartelised market &#8211; those are ripoffs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GerryOS</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/04/04/fluffy-links-april-4th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-209708</link>
		<dc:creator>GerryOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=2031#comment-209708</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;DRM free, the music might be but they charge more for it. Ripoff.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But the DRM-free music is sold at twice the encoding rate, 256kbps as opposed to 128kbps, and thus higher quality. 

It would be a ripoff if it were the only way to access the music, but of course, it&#039;s not. You can always buy the CD and rip it (completely DRM-free) if you wish. However you could end up paying a lot more, depending on where you buy it.

If you don&#039;t want to buy from iTunes, you don&#039;t have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>DRM free, the music might be but they charge more for it. Ripoff.</p></blockquote>
<p>But the DRM-free music is sold at twice the encoding rate, 256kbps as opposed to 128kbps, and thus higher quality. </p>
<p>It would be a ripoff if it were the only way to access the music, but of course, it&#8217;s not. You can always buy the CD and rip it (completely DRM-free) if you wish. However you could end up paying a lot more, depending on where you buy it.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to buy from iTunes, you don&#8217;t have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

