Comments on: Fluffy Links – February 14th 2007 http://www.mulley.net/2007/02/14/fluffy-links-february-14th-2007/ Invisible people have invisible rights Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Lex Ferenda » Internet law, without the tears http://www.mulley.net/2007/02/14/fluffy-links-february-14th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-162684 Lex Ferenda » Internet law, without the tears Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:06:17 +0000 http://www.mulley.net/?p=1935#comment-162684 [...] A few ads have appeared in print publications recently, reminding those who are working in limited companies to pay attention to an upcoming legal change. As a couple of people have mentioned this to me offline (”I saw this ad about law and emails, is that what you’re studying?” “Um, not really, but thanks”), and there are in fact some interesting, broad questions relating to the amendments to the European Communities (Companies) Regulations (for that is what they are talking about), here are my thoughts. Damien asks whether this is a silly law: on balance, I conclude that it should be OK. [...] [...] A few ads have appeared in print publications recently, reminding those who are working in limited companies to pay attention to an upcoming legal change. As a couple of people have mentioned this to me offline (”I saw this ad about law and emails, is that what you’re studying?” “Um, not really, but thanks”), and there are in fact some interesting, broad questions relating to the amendments to the European Communities (Companies) Regulations (for that is what they are talking about), here are my thoughts. Damien asks whether this is a silly law: on balance, I conclude that it should be OK. [...]

]]> By: Tipster http://www.mulley.net/2007/02/14/fluffy-links-february-14th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-155090 Tipster Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:46:55 +0000 http://www.mulley.net/?p=1935#comment-155090 Why do you think the new regulations are silly? I think <i>extending</i> the requirements to electronic documents is entirely logical. And I don't see any reason why they should not apply to the paper documents they apply to. Why do you think the new regulations are silly?

I think extending the requirements to electronic documents is entirely logical.

And I don’t see any reason why they should not apply to the paper documents they apply to.

]]> By: mark tighe http://www.mulley.net/2007/02/14/fluffy-links-february-14th-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-154794 mark tighe Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:57:10 +0000 http://www.mulley.net/?p=1935#comment-154794 Re. the silly laws and regulations. I think it's great. From a journalist's point of view it's a pain in the ass when websites don't list their contact details. It's like they have something to hide and don't want to talk to anyone. Some businesses only list contact details as a feedback form or email (while many don't have any contact details at all) which can take an age before you get to speak to a person. Re. the silly laws and regulations.

I think it’s great. From a journalist’s point of view it’s a pain in the ass when websites don’t list their contact details. It’s like they have something to hide and don’t want to talk to anyone. Some businesses only list contact details as a feedback form or email (while many don’t have any contact details at all) which can take an age before you get to speak to a person.

]]>