<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libel Insurance &#8211; Any cover for bloggers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-916714</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1864#comment-916714</guid>
		<description>Have any bloggers taken out libel insurance, and if so, with whom? Do you reckon it&#039;s a necessity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any bloggers taken out libel insurance, and if so, with whom? Do you reckon it&#8217;s a necessity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-132911</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1864#comment-132911</guid>
		<description>An indemnity doesn&#039;t mean that Publication X is no longer liable to victim Y. Instead it means that Publication X, having paid off victim Y, can pursue hapless freelancer Z for the sum paid to Y. (Plus costs, of course. Let&#039;s not forget the costs. You can be sure that us lawyers won&#039;t.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An indemnity doesn&#8217;t mean that Publication X is no longer liable to victim Y. Instead it means that Publication X, having paid off victim Y, can pursue hapless freelancer Z for the sum paid to Y. (Plus costs, of course. Let&#8217;s not forget the costs. You can be sure that us lawyers won&#8217;t.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cian</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-130344</link>
		<dc:creator>Cian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1864#comment-130344</guid>
		<description>Even as a young staff journalist a libel writ could be a career-ending notice, or so our lecturers continue to tell us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as a young staff journalist a libel writ could be a career-ending notice, or so our lecturers continue to tell us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Handelaar</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-129543</link>
		<dc:creator>John Handelaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1864#comment-129543</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;re not naming names and mentioning which UK publications are engaging in a practice which&#039;d get them blacklisted by the NUJ, I&#039;d vote for &#039;making shit up in order to sell policies&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;re not naming names and mentioning which UK publications are engaging in a practice which&#8217;d get them blacklisted by the NUJ, I&#8217;d vote for &#8216;making shit up in order to sell policies&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodshape</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-129462</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodshape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1864#comment-129462</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d imagine that &#039;freelancers&#039; is the key word there. You&#039;re essentially working for yourself and selling them a story, so you gotta cover your own ass.

Just a guess really. I&#039;m not a journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d imagine that &#8216;freelancers&#8217; is the key word there. You&#8217;re essentially working for yourself and selling them a story, so you gotta cover your own ass.</p>
<p>Just a guess really. I&#8217;m not a journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergus Cassidy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libel insurance follow-up</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2007/01/12/libel-insurance-any-cover-for-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-129247</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergus Cassidy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libel insurance follow-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1864#comment-129247</guid>
		<description>[...] Damien wonders: &#8216;I would have thought the publications as the ones publishing were the ones liable, contract or no&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Damien wonders: &#8216;I would have thought the publications as the ones publishing were the ones liable, contract or no&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

