<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eircom.  A better attitude or just a better accent? &#8211; Irish Telecoms Review 2006 Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2006/12/25/eircom-a-better-aattitude-or-just-a-better-accent-irish-telecoms-review-2006-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2006/12/25/eircom-a-better-aattitude-or-just-a-better-accent-irish-telecoms-review-2006-part-1/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evert</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2006/12/25/eircom-a-better-aattitude-or-just-a-better-accent-irish-telecoms-review-2006-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-114718</link>
		<dc:creator>Evert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1803#comment-114718</guid>
		<description>It is great to read this only days after I had my head &quot;bitten off&quot; on this blog by another reader for suggesting that LLU made no business sense (for Eircom)....

E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great to read this only days after I had my head &#8220;bitten off&#8221; on this blog by another reader for suggesting that LLU made no business sense (for Eircom)&#8230;.</p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2006/12/25/eircom-a-better-aattitude-or-just-a-better-accent-irish-telecoms-review-2006-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-114675</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1803#comment-114675</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Winson, are there minutes for that meeting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Winson, are there minutes for that meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2006/12/25/eircom-a-better-aattitude-or-just-a-better-accent-irish-telecoms-review-2006-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-114659</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=1803#comment-114659</guid>
		<description>You know, you would have &quot;enjoyed&quot; a meeting of the Monitoring Committee of the Southern and Eastern Region Operational Programme in October/November. An official from the EU Commission was steered off (by the chair of the Monitoring Committee) asking &quot;rude&quot; questions of the Dept Communications (And Whatever is Added to it These Days) about Eircom and the slow roll-out of broadband. The Commission official was allowed to &quot;probe&quot; the slow (&lt;i&gt;read&lt;/i&gt;: &quot;non&quot;) implementation of the Dept&#039;s programme (little to no interest in take up by communities was the reason given, if my memory serves me correctly) but once Eircom&#039;s performance was mentioned, it was pointed out that such issues really lay with the competition regulators and not the Department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, you would have &#8220;enjoyed&#8221; a meeting of the Monitoring Committee of the Southern and Eastern Region Operational Programme in October/November. An official from the EU Commission was steered off (by the chair of the Monitoring Committee) asking &#8220;rude&#8221; questions of the Dept Communications (And Whatever is Added to it These Days) about Eircom and the slow roll-out of broadband. The Commission official was allowed to &#8220;probe&#8221; the slow (<i>read</i>: &#8220;non&#8221;) implementation of the Dept&#8217;s programme (little to no interest in take up by communities was the reason given, if my memory serves me correctly) but once Eircom&#8217;s performance was mentioned, it was pointed out that such issues really lay with the competition regulators and not the Department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
