<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsense for Angel Funding,  Adsense for Charity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulley.net/2005/11/22/adsense-for-angel-funding-adsense-for-charity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulley.net/2005/11/22/adsense-for-angel-funding-adsense-for-charity/</link>
	<description>Invisible people have invisible rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Blandford</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2005/11/22/adsense-for-angel-funding-adsense-for-charity/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Blandford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=772#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Em, to my knowledge....

You are responsible for every site the ads get placed on. And hence if you give the code to others (even though they can read it from your source) then if they implement it against t&amp;c you get the flack, and will be asked to remove it, which you can&#039;t do as you&#039;ve no access.

Interesting idea:
Will there be competitors pissing each other off by setting up clickfraud framing? Or slappign ad code all over the place in very dodgy placements etc..? to get the company excluded from the adwords programme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Em, to my knowledge&#8230;.</p>
<p>You are responsible for every site the ads get placed on. And hence if you give the code to others (even though they can read it from your source) then if they implement it against t&amp;c you get the flack, and will be asked to remove it, which you can&#8217;t do as you&#8217;ve no access.</p>
<p>Interesting idea:<br />
Will there be competitors pissing each other off by setting up clickfraud framing? Or slappign ad code all over the place in very dodgy placements etc..? to get the company excluded from the adwords programme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.mulley.net/2005/11/22/adsense-for-angel-funding-adsense-for-charity/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulley.net/?p=772#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea.  Could also work well for an organisation like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concern.ie/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Concern&lt;/a&gt;.  But you probably can&#039;t say something like &quot;click on the ad below to help Concern&quot;.  I think Google&#039;s adsense program only allows somthing along the lines of &quot;Sponsors&quot; or &quot;Advertisements&quot;, so the user will not know it&#039;s for Concern.

You could probably put a note somewhere that all contributions to your blog go to Concern - although even at that the Google guys could probably object if they wanted.  I must talk to someone in Concern, get them to set up an account.  There&#039;s no real downside.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea.  Could also work well for an organisation like <a href="http://www.concern.ie/" rel="nofollow">Concern</a>.  But you probably can&#8217;t say something like &#8220;click on the ad below to help Concern&#8221;.  I think Google&#8217;s adsense program only allows somthing along the lines of &#8220;Sponsors&#8221; or &#8220;Advertisements&#8221;, so the user will not know it&#8217;s for Concern.</p>
<p>You could probably put a note somewhere that all contributions to your blog go to Concern &#8211; although even at that the Google guys could probably object if they wanted.  I must talk to someone in Concern, get them to set up an account.  There&#8217;s no real downside.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
